Hugh writes: I am poor company in art galleries. I much prefer powering through alone and stopping only when a canvas arrests me. I have previously written about the effect encountering The Subway (1950) by George Tooker had on me in New York. I had a similar experience on seeing this painting of The Last Supper in Bruges. ![]() The artist is Gustave Van de Woestijne (1881–1947), a Belgian expressionist painter. He entered the Benedictine order in Leuven in 1905, but quickly sensed that monastic life was not for him and left after four weeks. Maybe their pre-admission preparation was not up to the mark.
He remained a Christian. An expression of this is seen in this monumental portrayal of the Last Supper. It has something of the feral to it, don't you think? Through it he expresses criticism of convential artistic piety: "Away with this saccharine, stultifying, strait-laced religious art! We’ve had enough of it, and our Catholic Church is already crammed full of all kinds of such bland stuff. […] I am neither edified nor affected when I enter our churches and look at the modern ornaments, statues or paintings, on the contrary, I have the urge to curse". His style was considered blasphemous by some. An encouraging sign. Fortunately, he found support from the van Buurens, Brussels art collectors who bought many of his works and, in 1927, sponsored a trip to Florence that allowed him to study fresco art. This canvas reflects his interest in fresco painting and his quest for modern religious art. Why does it strike me so? For a start, it is not mannered or pretty. No halos or pious expressions. No looking up, heavenwards. The proportions of the canvas (taller than it is wide) requires that the disciples huddle close. Something important is happening - draw near, it calls. There is no iconography, only the essentials: wine and a loaf of bread. And the bread is an ordinary loaf, no delicate host. It belongs in the ordinary transaction of heavenly realities. The apostles depicted here could be miners or labourers or fishermen. Hairstyles are those of the 1920s, pitch black, neatly combed. There is a sad solemnity in their grave faces. Jesus’ passion happens every day again. Jesus’ hair and beard are red, along with the wine and along with the hair of the figure on the lower left. Judas, maybe? Jesus looks towards him. I can't reliably read his expression. Van De Woestijne's picture has no extras, only the essentials - table, people, bread, wine - needed to depict the Last Supper. These betoken solidarity (God with us), tragedy, longing, love. The building bricks of our human adventure. Hugh Valentine
1 Comment
Glenn
26/1/2025 04:12:45 am
Thank you for sharing this painting and your insight. I am not an artist and not a fan of art in general but I appreciate art, the artists, their work, and expressions as I would hope someone appreciates my work in music. I notice the baggy eyes, hands, and fingers immediately. It says to me that they are a people who work hard. It might be a result of Roman authority. The small room seems to say poverty and possibly that they are crammed here in hiding. These are common people trying to do right amidst a world that is doing wrong. The direction of these men's glance could indeed mean many things. Some are looking to Jesus, some looking away from him, one looking only at the food. An interesting painting.
Reply
Your comment will be posted after it is approved.
Leave a Reply. |